Posts Tagged ‘CONSPIRACY’

Jessie Ventura Vs JFK Conspiracy

Whell it wasn´t a question if Ventura should touch the subject, rather a question about when. Is he going for the truth like everyone else that have researched this case and found amazingly new evidence?

Let´s have a look and see what Ventura have found.

Just in the first minutes there are a error, the narrator says:

You thought the case where closed but Jessie Ventura tears it wide open

I will come to why he dosen´t tear it wide open later on, its quite intresting acctually.

Sure it looks great that Saint John Hunt will have to hide in a simple motel because he´s afraid.
In his own words:

The more exposure i get by telling my story, puts me in a greater level of danger.

Of Coruse, Hunt is afraid, he´s in great danger when he speaks about the information that he has. So is this his only appreance? Whell no. Just check saintjohnhunt.com where he sell the truth, isn´t that remarkable if he is afraid and under threat?

The man in the wheelchair gives Ventura some documents, new evidence (very classified) He even sleeps whit a gun under his pillow. Now this is intresting. What could this information to be?
Whell it´s about something called Operation 40, that where going to be used against Castro, but is suspected to have been used against JFK.

First of all, Operation 40 was already mentioned in 1990:s so this is not exactly new evidence, just pure old crap whitout any info about this is true or not.

And finally, of course there is a huge force and conspiracy that Jessie Ventura is not allowed to film at JFK´s gravesite….

The documents on Operation 40 where known already in 1992 when James Earl Jones hosted JFK Conspiracy

And what about Hunt´s confesion, haven´t we heard that storie before?
Whell Nigel Turner made a movie in 1988 called The Men Who killed Kennedy where the CIA is accused for beeing behind the assasination by hiring a french hitman whit the name Lucien Sartie, and what does Hunt´s confession contain?

So, how much is new information after all? But still it can be true, i just don´t like the way the information is presented as new and dangerous, when the information been known for years and people are trying to earn money on this dangerous information.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Targenor - 18 januari 2011 at 12:00

Categories: Conspiracy, Debunked, english, JFK   Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

9/11 CONSPIRACY: A CONTROLLED DEMOLITION DESTROYED THE WTC!!

This film will leave you in shock

Whell it kind of did, just reading the info about the movie was scary enough

Marvin P. Bush, the president’s younger brother, was a principal in a company called Securacom that provided security for the World Trade Center, United Airlines, and Dulles International Airport. The company was backed by KuwAm, a Kuwaiti-American investment firm on whose board Marvin Bush also served.
According to its present CEO, Barry McDaniel, the company had an ongoing contract to handle security at the World Trade Center ”up to the day the buildings fell down.”

Marvin P. Bush had nothing to do whit World Trade Center….
But hey, why bother whit the truth, it sounds good atleast.

Jonathan Barnett Professor in Fire Protection Enginering

In a normal fire we don´t have building collapses

Whell thats true, but sometime have to bee the first, it also is a question on how much the steel can carry when it gets hot… a clue it looses the abillity to carry long before it melts.

Then there is more talk about explosions, thousands of explosives placed around the building, and it all survvived the planechrash ?
Why didn´t the towers feel at once?

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Targenor - 02 april 2010 at 12:00

Categories: Brott & Straff, Conspiracy, Debunked, english, Historia   Tags: , , , ,

Bill O’Reilly is a JFK ”Conspiracy Theorist”

This video is intresting by the case of Antonio Veciana who claims to have been shot by the members of the conspiracy since he was talking about it.
One simple but yet important question rises then, why is he alive?

Its very cleaver to save wittneses like this, and how could they knew he was going to stop talking about it?

My guess is, Antonio wasn´t shot by people from the consparicy but someone else and then by paranoia claims it was.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Targenor - 30 november 2009 at 18:00

Categories: Brott & Straff, Conspiracy, Debunked, english, Historia, JFK   Tags: , , , ,

JFK – Secret Service standdown

This is often used as evidence for a conspiracy since the bodyguards are beeing waved off and never returned to the car.
But the truth is so simple that it was JFK´s decision, since he wanted to show that he didn´t turned away to threat and to also needed to show him self in public not surronded by bodyguards.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Targenor - 28 november 2009 at 17:34

Categories: Brott & Straff, Conspiracy, Debunked, english, Historia, JFK   Tags: , , , ,

Bill Hicks on JFK Conspiracy

I just love this video

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Targenor - 14 november 2009 at 8:00

Categories: english, Humor, JFK   Tags: , ,

Conspiracy Theories – 9/11 Truth Movement part 2

No other scyskrapers in the world have collapsed due to fire.

Whell no, but very few of these also got hit by airplanes.
The narrator also claims that there could not be any hard evindence in this since the towers stod up after getting hit. Whell everyone whit a small piece of brain knows that things just don´t fall at once everytime, its just that simple

The Buildings were Rigged whit explosives because

The attack were Anticipated or An internal US Agency planed the demolition.

So far this is not much to go on, but still people find these things as the truth, why?

Point one that he takes up

Radical Symetry

The towers fell down along them selfs and very little debris fell down far away from the towers, this is acctually a very common fenomen when buildings collapses.

2 Rapid decent

This point is not any problem either, the force that come frome above turned out to be to massive that the lower part didn´t manage to hold it back.
If this was the work of explosives, why did the top fell first? when you demolish a house whit explosive it falls down and up, not up and down.

3 Demolition waves

Synchronised exlosives where used to trigger the fall of the towers.

This is amazing how people could fall for, it would take alot of time for the bombers to plant all of this, WTC wasn´t a 9-5 workplace which means that people would have seen something, but i guess they are being bribed or just is scared to speak out.

Researchers has studied films and photos and have noticed that windows is beeing blown out before the building comes down.

This is also something that dosen´t have to point to explosives. The buildings where really damaged and surely you don´t expect them to stand still when the plane hits, so of course there would have been tention on the windows which then later breaks.

Panncake theory is belived by some to not be possible, whell humans didn´t think the Wright Brothers airplane would lift off or be a huge industry either.

4 Demolition squibs

Almost before and during the collapse small ”squids” are seen blowing out ot the towers windows, this could also be dust particals that is beeing blown out.
As i said before, the uper part of the towers come down whit speed, and speed creates airwaves.

So no, this is not the way to build a conspiracy theory whit credebility or pasubility.

Be the first to comment - What do you think?  Posted by Targenor - 20 januari 2009 at 0:00

Categories: Brott & Straff, Conspiracy, Debunked, english, Historia   Tags: , , , ,